An excellent standard procedure is a possession. Organizations have had them permanently.
The only issue I have with a few of the flowing standard procedures are that they aren’t specific in what is a concern. They utilize sweeping generalisations or unclear declarations. Lots of come down to “we can’t specify it however we understand it when we see it. Trust us”
That is extremely troublesome and open up to abuse. There have actually been a couple of restricted examples of this in the past.
Some examples of these consist of a few of the goings on at PyCon and other conventions where reputable members have actually been omitted from discussing disagreements.
I do not indicate like “X is a Nazi” type of “disagreements” I indicate like real harmless disagreement. Like the individual who’s talk was cancelled for “unduly teasing somebody” when the individual being “badgered” assisted compose the talk and it wasn’t even in fact teasing them.
Anyhow TL; DR. Codes of conduct requirement to A) be specific of what is not okay. B) have a clear procedure for what will take place in case of a breach C) have an objective board for evaluating the breaches. Ideally external to the job. Most likely another job with a comparable or very same CoC.
All the problems I offered seen generally come down to “the individual who disagreed was likewise the one who decides” integrated with “There was no clear overview of what remained in breach or what the procedure or charges were”
These are not favorable to being welcoming